A different type of slit experiment using a cross slit, or horizontal and vertical slits (or opposing diagonal slits).

Differential Set
Continuous Hierarchy
Smooth Collection
This is my attempt at materialize Plato's Theory of Forms (as I understand it). It is also the beginning of signal computer. When we measure a signal, it either ends up being analog or digital, because we cannot measure superposition. However, if the digital and analog are along separate axes, then we *might* be able to measure the superposition. This is the theory of steps and rails. If the light experiment slits form a cross, what happens?

Form	Function	Class
Structure	Change, Behavior	Object, Thing, Animation
Discrete	Continuous	Curve
Digital	Analog	Signal
Particle	Wave	Superposition
Step	Rail	Coordinate System
CD	Record

This is my cross system. My next system will be a cross and post system. WOPR, how about a friendly game of jacks?

Generating functions.

Generators create steps. Iterators take steps. What creates rails? Parametric functions? Hmm. It would seem like a generator (function) that creates curves and surfaces and volumes and hypervolumes (all are hypershapes). The whole thing in one call. What are lambda functions? What are generators which generate hypermovies and hyperdocuments? JSP used to generate hyperdocuments. Now it seems like JavaScript generates hyperdocuments.

Smooth Collections and Fundamental Forms and Functions

I am currently focusing on "Smooth Collections" in my thinking.  These are essentially coordinate systems if you can believe it.  They are related to "Continuous Hierarchies" or "Smooth Hierarchies."  I believe this is opposed to "Tangled Hierarchies" and "Strange Loops" by Hofstadter.  I believe that my ideas may be an extension of Hofstadter, but not sure.  There are many practical examples of "smooth collections," including ladders, railroad tracks, dartboards, DNA, and the coordinate systems for the Earth. The essential ingredients are steps and rails.  I consider steps a noun/verb and rails a noun.  I am still looking for examples of "Continuous Hierarchies" in the spatial dimensions.   The movie "Next" and the book "The Golden Man" by Philip K. Dick describe continuous hierarchies in time. I almost threw Form (Structure) out with the trash until a Materialistic Christian explained what  a resource was last night. I concluded that belief was the fundamental form in the universe (you can't believe in anything else until you first believe in belief), and believe is the fundamental function.  (This follows the cult AvatarEPC, whose seminar I attended and I ended up in the hospital after attending. Ouch.).  The second fundamental function to the universe and people's religion is behave, and good behavior is the second fundamental form. Good beliefs and good behavior are the two essentials in everyone's life.  Religion is not necessary if one can create their own good beliefs and good behavior.  Create is the 3rd function and creation is the 3rd form.  I believe we do this in conjunction with a higher creator, but some people's beliefs do not require a higher creator.   This "higher power" is required if people cannot get their "behavior" and/or "beliefs" to be satisfactory to them and the universe they live (be-live) in.  I do not know if I am stuck in this believe system or not.  AvatarEPC says I am not. I am not really willing to change at this time. I would be interested in your fundamental forms and functions.  You said knowledge and goals somewhere as structure.  Know, achieve and fail might be your behavior or functions. I have not yet seriously pursued adjective or adverbs except "good."  I realize that things can be both good and bad.  It's complex. So it appears that my fundamental creation affirmation is "I believe. I behave."  Also, "I think," alongside Descartes, "I decide,"  is Harry Palmer I guess, and "I am," God, "I am first," a god named Simon Halliburton on Facebook, "I am the Alpha and the Omega", Jesus.  Your fundamental creation affirmations appear to be "I learn, my goal is to increase my knowledge," I think, but you can correct me.  Then you have to decide what knowledge you believe in, correct? Or do you?" Another affirmation is "I feel." I do not know if "I believe" or "I think" is more fundamental in my mind. I don't know if beliefs are thoughts are not.  Descartes says thinking is prior to existence.  So thoughts or beliefs in ourselves makes us pop into reality?  Hmmm. I got "I behave" from my family situation.  It may actually be "I do not behave well." Hence my illness and guilt. I believe if we return the whole universe to unity, or zero creations, then we get to re-experience creation, thus it is important to have your affirmations ready for a "universal upset" which happens after the Big Bang.  Think "Fruit Basket Upset" or "Musical Chairs" games. Listen for when the music of the universe stops.

Smooth Collections

Smooth Collections Smooth Collections are essentially coordinate systems, cartesian, polar, spherical. In reality, they take many forms: ladders, stairs, railroads, dartboards, roads with mile markers, DNA, 12-step programs (progress is a rail, higher power is a rail). There essential features are steps and rails. Steps are both verbs and nouns. Rails are nouns. Belief is a step. Reality is a rail. Nerves are a rail, and each neuron is a step. Smooth Collections are related to Continuous Hierarchies. I hazard to say that Continuous Hierarchies are made up of Smooth Collections, but I don't know of a hierarchical coordinate system. Numbers seem to be hierarchical in some ways. In a fence or firewall, the rails become posts and the steps become rails.

Artificial General Intelligence (Solved).

The important thing is to realize is that humans have limited numbers of inputs and outputs, so the key to AGI is in 1) the processing. 1) can be done with neural networks today. 2) the inputs. We need a wide range of inputs. This is not limited in time. 3) We need a wide range of outputs, but many classes of outputs per time-step. We have a limited number of outputs, but may reuse outputs over time. The important thing is to realize we can generate multiple classes of outputs in the same neural network. Also, we can have multiple classes of data on input. Is that easy enough for you? Simple and doable, except perhaps for expanding our current hardware capabilities. Merely extend your inputs and outputs and add more objects (bits) for the neural network to handle. John W Carlson